Legal Opinion

Superior Glass, Inc. v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 1, 2017No. A16-1433; A16-1504PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge

In this consolidated certiorari appeal, relator argues that unemployment-law judges (1) erred in determining that its employees are eligible for unemployment-insurance benefit accounts in Minnesota, and (2) applied Minn. Stat. § 268.035, subd. 12(a), to result in double taxation of relator in violation of the Dormant Commerce Clause. We affirm.

FACTS

Relator Superior Glass Inc. is a Wisconsin company with company headquarters in Superior, Wisconsin. Respondent-employees Lucas Johnson and Shawn Strang performed work for Superior Glass in both Minnesota and Wisconsin during…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Hellmich v. HellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. WynneSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald DriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bremer Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. MatejcekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API