Legal Opinion

Deegan v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 2006No. A05-24PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

We review the question of whether MinmStat. § 590.05 (2004) violates the United States or Minnesota Constitutions because it provides that a petitioner who pleaded guilty, received no greater than the presumptive sentence, and did not pursue a direct appeal is not entitled to representation by the state public defender in a posteonvietion petition if the state public defender reviews the case and determines that there is no basis to appeal the conviction or sentence. Specifically, our review focuses on the 2003 amendment to section 590.05, which added the following:

If,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Halbert v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Schleicher v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Andersen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API