Legal Opinion

Hickman v. Group Health Plan, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 24, 1986No. C2-85-2013PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

This case comes to us as a certified question from the Hennepin County District Court. The issue to be determined is the constitutionality of Minnesota’s wrongful birth statute, Minn.Stat. § 145.424, subd. 2 (1984). The district court, in ruling on cross motions for partial summary judgment, struck down the wrongful birth statute as unconstitutional under Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973). Noting the significance of this question, however, pursuant to Minn.R.Civ. App.P. 103.03(h), the district court certified it to us as important and doubtful.

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Soto Cabral v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1995
  3. Snyder v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Johnson v. University HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API