Legal Opinion
Hurley v. State
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1966No. File 10110PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, Judge.'
This is the final chapter, we trust, in protracted proceedings involving damages claimed by an abutting property owner for loss of access to West Boulevard in Rapid City. The action orig-*159mated against the city. On appeal, Hurley v. City of Rapid City, 80 S.D. 180, 121 N.W.2d 21, it was determined the city was not legally responsible for the damages claimed. Plaintiffs then filed a claim in the amount of $75,000 against the State of South Dakota. The claim was denied and this action commenced under SDC 1960 Supp. 33.0604. The Hon. F. Thomas Parker, one of the judges of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Darnall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- State Highway Commission v. BloomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Searle v. City of LeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Wolff v. Secretary of the South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks DepartmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Boland v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Rupert v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Krier v. Dell Rapids Twp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.