Darnall v. State
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBiegelmeier, J.
This is what plaintiff terms an inverse condemnation action against the state of South Dakota and the members of the State Highway Commission for damages for claimed loss of access to a highway. Plaintiffs are the owners of three lots on the edge of the village of Piedmont with 150 feet of frontage on the west side of First Street; on these were a small cafe,, a two-unit and a four-unit cabin and a gas pump. The street was 80 feet in width and designated as U. S. Highway 14 and State Highway 79. It had a blacktop surface of standard width with two lanes of travel from which motorists could…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. ThelbergArizona Supreme Court · 1960
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. HuftileSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Hurley v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Benson v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. DanfelserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.