Legal Opinion
Wolff v. Secretary of the South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks Department
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Justice.
[¶ 1] Gary and Shirley Wolff (Wolffs) appeal the trial court’s dismissal of then.’ action against the Secretary of the South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks (the Secretary). We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2] Wolffs own a parcel of real property near the Angostura State Recreation Area (Angostura). The United States Government acquired Angostura in 1949 when the area was condemned pursuant to the Flood Control Act of 1944. The State of South Dakota leases Angostura from the federal government and the South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks (the Department) manages the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Tibke v. McDougallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Keith Gibb v. John Scott, Keith Gibb v. World Book, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Russo Farms, Inc. v. Vineland Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Holzer v. Dakota Speedway, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Sherburn v. Patterson Farms, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Greenway Development Co. v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Guthmiller v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.