Legal Opinion

Boland v. City of Rapid City

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1982No. 13121-13131, 13204PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

This action arose from the destruction of appellees’ property by appellants, Rapid City and Pennington County, under “Operation Bulldozer,” a cleanup operation following the 1972 flood which inundated a large part of the Rapid City area. The Circuit Court dismissed appellees’ action against the State, but upheld their actions against appellants. The trial court also denied ap-pellees’ request for attorney fees. This ap peal concerns appellants’ liability for the destruction of appellees’ property and the trial court’s denial of appellees’ request for attorney fees. We affirm.

Th…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. State Highway Commission v. Hayes EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Jolicoeur Furniture Co., Inc. v. BaldelliSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  3. Miller v. HernandezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Rupert v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. COUNTY EXEC., PRINCE GEO'S CTY. v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API