Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Hubbell

California Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 14186PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Two appeals are here presented from the final decree of distribution entered in the above-entitled estate. The appeals have been consolidated by stipulation of the parties and are presented upon a single transcript and set of briefs.

Russell H. Hubbell, the decedent, died November 4, 1928. His last will and testament, together with a codicil thereto, were admitted to probate on November 26, 1928. Decedent bequeathed $30,000' to each of the appellants herein. During the course of administration of the estate a decree of partial distribution was duly entered under the terms of which there was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kent v. DunhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. County of San Bernardino v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. In re Estate of BabyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Storke v. StorkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Templeton Feed & Grain v. Ralston Purina Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Schubert v. ReichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. General Insurance v. Mammoth Vista Owners' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API