Legal Opinion

Lee v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1953No. 242PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

Tbe appellant assigns as error tbe refusal of tbe court below to permit one of tbe plaintiff’s witnesses to testify to tbe contents of a conversation tbe witness bad with a Mr. Hill, wbo was on tbe defendant’s train at tbe time plaintiff’s intestate was killed. Tbe witness did not identify Mr. Hill as being in any way connected witb tbe defendant, and tbe record does not disclose tbe substance or tenor of'tbe conversation or that it would have tended to corroborate tbe testimony of tbe witness or tbe testimony of other witnesses wbo bad testified for tbe plaintiff. Hence, this assignment of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Hubbard v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Matheny v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Mercer v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Warren v. . SusmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wade Ex Rel. Wade v. Jones Sausage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Hughes v. Anchor Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Irby v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. C. David Swift, Administrator of the Estate of Berl B. Cantrell, Deceased v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  5. Dowdy v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API