Warren v. . Susman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendants from Peebles, J., at October Term, 1914, of Pamlico. This action was brought to recover the value of certain mules and land sold by defendant, the Washington Horse Exchange Company, under a mortgage giyen by the defendant to it. There is a power of sale 'in the mortgage, but it is restricted to the land.
Read the full summary
Appeal by defendants from Peebles, J., at October Term, 1914, of Pamlico. This action was brought to recover the value of certain mules and land sold by defendant, the Washington Horse Exchange Company, under a mortgage giyen by the defendant to it. There is a power of sale 'in the mortgage, but it is restricted to the land. It was executed to-secure $500, the price of the two mules, for which two notes of $250 each were given on 9 March, 1910, one payable 1 November, 1910, and the other on 1 November, 1911. The transaction took place in Pamlico County where the land is situated and where the…
1Opinion of the Court
This action was brought to recover the value of certain mules and land sold by defendant, the Washington Horse Exchange Company, under a mortgage given by the defendant to it. There is a power of sale in the mortgage, but it is restricted to the land. It was (459) executed to secure $500, the price of the two mules, for which two notes of $250 each were given on 9 March, 1910, one payable 1 November, 1910, and the other on 1 November, 1911. The transaction took place in Pamlico County where the land is situated and where the mortgage was registered. Plaintiff changed his residence to Carteret…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sprinkle v. Wellborn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Johnson—Brinkman Commission Co. v. Central BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State v. . LeakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Froneberger v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Shipp Ex Rel. Shipp v. United Stage Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Peterson v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Pue v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Mills v. . Building Loan Assn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.