Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1940PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNbobNE, J.

Tbis question determines the controversy on this appeal: Is there sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury under the doctrine of last clear chance which is invoked by plaintiff? The court below said “No.” With this answer we are in agreement.

The principles of law here involved were recently restated and applied in the case Cummings v. R. R., 217 N. C., 127, 6 S. E. (2d), 837. What is said there is applicable here.

At the outset let it be noted that this is not a case of a railroad crossing accident. To the contrary, plaintiff contends that at the time her intestate was struck by a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . PrinceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Redmon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Poovey v. International Sugar Feed No. Two Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Henderson v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Mills v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Mitchell v. . MeltsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Lane v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API