Hubbard v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The defendant is a common carrier by railroad, engaged in interstate commerce, and the plaintiff was employed by the defendant in such commerce at the time of bis injury. The case, therefore, is one arising under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. Cobia v. R. R. 188 N. C., 487, 125 S. E., 18; Soles v. R. R., 184 N. C., 283, 114 S. E., 305.
Plaintiff was injured 13 June, 1930, near Charlotte, N. C., while engaged in tbe discharge of bis duties as helper to C. E. McClure, signal maintainer and foreman over a section of road twelve or fourteen miles in length. The plaintiff had completed bis…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Pendergrast v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Sebastian v. Horton Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.