Legal Opinion
Aamodt v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 10, 1992No. Nos. 91-5101, 91-5102PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
These appeals present common issues of law, and are combined for decision. In accordance with Muniz v. United States, 972 F.2d 1304 (Fed.Cir.1992), we affirm the holdings of the' United States Claims Court,1 dismissing the complaints in both actions for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We review de novo the correctness of the Claims Court’s dismissal.
Both actions involve overtime pay claims pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. The appellants in Aamodt are former special agents *692who are or were employed with the Department of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Carter v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Muniz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Aamodt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Gilbert Hess v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
3Cited by16 opinions
- Abbott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Kevin A. Dunklebarger v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- O'Connell v. Hove, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the UNITED STATES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Hickman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.