Legal Opinion
Armitage v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 20, 1991No. Nos. 139-89C, 568-89C, 632-89C, 690-89C and 90-53CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*484OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment, plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the court’s October 5, 1989 order denying class certification, 18 Cl.Ct. 310, and plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint in one of the consolidated cases.1 The remaining plaintiffs2 in these consolidated cases allege that they were and are entitled to overtime and premium pay for regularly scheduled overtime, Sunday and holiday hours during authorized absences from work under the “leave with pay” provisions of the Federal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority v. Citizens for the Abatement of Aircraft Noise, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Young v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Armitage v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Agee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Abbott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Yanko v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Armstrong v. ArchuletaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.