Legal Opinion

Armitage v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 18, 1991No. Nos. 139-89C, 568-89C, 632-89C, 690-89C, 90-53CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This case is before the court on the Government’s motion to dismiss 134 plaintiffs for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases allege that they were and are entitled to premium and overtime pay for regularly-scheduled overtime, Súnday and holiday hours during authorized leave from work under the “leave with pay” provisions of the Federal Employees Pay Act (“Title 5”).1 See 5 U.S.C. §§ 6303, 6307, 6322, and 6323 (1988). Defendant contends that the exclusive method for resolving the pay disputes of the employees at issue is the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Armitage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API