Legal Opinion

Brammer v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 21, 1991No. 312-89CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBINSON, Judge:

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff, William Brammer, seeks reimbursement for moving expenses in the amount of $22,152.16 plus interest and costs,1 and maintains that jurisdiction is present under 28 U.S.C. § 1491. Defendant contends that under the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA), 5 U.S.C. § 7101, et seq., plaintiff’s exclusive means for resolving this claim is through the negotiated grievance procedures in the collective bargaining agreements to which plaintiff was subject during the relevant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Fort Stewart Schools v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Carter v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Hedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Savas Suzal v. Director, United States Information AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  2. Savas Suzal v. Director, United States Information AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API