Brammer v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge:
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff, William Brammer, seeks reimbursement for moving expenses in the amount of $22,152.16 plus interest and costs,1 and maintains that jurisdiction is present under 28 U.S.C. § 1491. Defendant contends that under the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA), 5 U.S.C. § 7101, et seq., plaintiff’s exclusive means for resolving this claim is through the negotiated grievance procedures in the collective bargaining agreements to which plaintiff was subject during the relevant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Fort Stewart Schools v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Carter v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Hedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Savas Suzal v. Director, United States Information AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Savas Suzal v. Director, United States Information AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994