Legal Opinion
Moore v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 15, 1977No. 48889PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Chief Justice.
This case involves the review of an administrative proceeding involving a quasi-judicial hearing before the Board of Commissioners of the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma. The matter arose as a hearing on a license suspension for a private club for alleged violation of city ordinances relating to nude dancing and consumption of alcoholic beverages.1
*963It is asserted on appeal that the ordinance regulating nude dancing, Tulsa, Okl.Rev.Ord. Title XXI, Ch. 21, § 412(b)(3) 1974, is an unconstitutional restriction on first amendment rights, and it is also argued that 37 O.S.1971 § 518(b)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Consumers Coal Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Ray v. DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
- City of Birmingham v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- City of Harlan v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Simpson v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Hampton by and Through Hampton v. HammonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Vinson v. MedleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Allen v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.