Legal Opinion
Hampton by and Through Hampton v. Hammons
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 21, 1987No. 64649PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, Justice.
The issues presented concern the sufficiency of evidence to show: (1) negligence per se by violation of Tulsa Municipal Ordinance, Title 2, Ch. 1, § 2(d); (2) violation of the state dog-bite statute, Title 4 O.S.1981 § 42.1; (8) common law negligence; and (4) attractive nuisance. We find that: (1) there are material questions of fact necessitating jury resolution on the issues of negligence per se, statutory recovery, and common law negligence; (2) that although some evidence was excluded which should have been admitted, the exclusion in and of itself did not amount to…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Grand River Dam Authority v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Kimery v. Public Service Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- City of Shawnee v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Coosewoon v. Meridian Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Howard v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Busby v. Quail Creek Golf & Country ClubSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Johnson v. Hillcrest Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.