Legal Opinion
City of Birmingham v. West
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 30, 1938No. 6 Div. 343PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
Appellee filed a bill in equity to enjoin the city of Birmingham from enforcing a certain city ordinance pertaining to the vaccination of her dog against rabies, and to the collection of a license fee. She alleges that she owns a dog and keeps him at her .residence in the city of Birmingham, and at all times within its curtilage, never allowing him to run at large, but confines him in a small enclosure of wire; that he was vaccinated against rabies in December 1937 .by a licensed veterinarian in compliance with the state law in that respect. Acts 1936-37, Sp.Sess., page 230.
She…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex parte CowertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- City of Birmingham v. Hood-Mcpherson Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Mitchell v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Gilchrist Drug Co. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Ward v. MarksteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Congo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Moore v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Woodruff v. CentanneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Smith v. Town of NotasulgaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Randall E. Lanier v. City of Newton, Alabama, Etc., Chief of Police in His Official Capacity of the City of Newton, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.