Ray v. Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous
The sole question presented on this review is whether Denver ordinance No. 49, Series 1941, passed June 2, 1941, is invalid by reason of its alleged conflict with the state law (chapter 157, S.L. 1935; sections 6 to 21 inclusive, chapter 88, ’35 C.S.A.), concerning interest rates and charges on loans of $300 or less each. In a declaratory judgment action instituted by plaintiff in error, to whom we shall hereinafter refer as plaintiff, the district court adjudged that no conflict existed and held the ordinance valid. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff, as a licensee under the state law,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Schwartz v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Parsons v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- State Ex Rel. Cozart v. CarranOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- City of Bellingham v. CissnaWashington Supreme Court · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. Bowen/Edwards Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- City and County of Denver v. SweetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- In Re Interrogatories Propounded by the Senate Concerning House Bill 1078Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Greeley Police Union v. City Council of GreeleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.