Legal Opinion
Peppin v. W.H. Brady Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 6, 1985No. C9-84-1916PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is an appeal by Parker-Hannifin from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict entered on October 29, 1984. The respondent has filed a cross-appeal on several issues. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1977 the plaintiff in this action, Gail Peppin, sustained personal injuries at work when a trim press which she was operating mis-cycled and descended upon her right arm. Peppin sued Parker-Hannifin, who had manufactured the trim press. Parker-Hannifin thereupon commenced a third-party action against the Allen-Bradley Corp., which had manufactured the palm switch used to operate the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Conover v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Gryc Ex Rel. Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Strong v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Westbrock v. Marshalltown Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Holowaty v. McDonald's, Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Todalen v. United States Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Beniek v. Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.