Legal Opinion
Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 16, 1989No. Civ. 3-85-1599PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RENNER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are defendant G.D. Searle & Co.'s motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 50(b)(1), and for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(a)(1). On December 1, 1988 the Court held a hearing on the motions and took them under advisement. The Court, at that time, also heard arguments on plaintiff’s 1 post-trial motions. These motions will be addressed in a separate opinion.
Defendant G.D. Searle & Co. asserts numerous grounds in support of its motions. First, it asks the Court to enter JNOV on…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Dunn v. HOVICCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Incorporated v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Lance v. WyethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- State v. PiperSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- Gregory v. Cincinnati Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.