Legal Opinion
Westbrock v. Marshalltown Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 23, 1991No. C5-90-2683PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.
Appellants bring this appeal from the dismissal by summary judgment of their complaint in a products liability action alleging negligence in the design of a mechanical punch press; failure to provide proper safety guards; and failure to warn of potential hazards. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for trial.
FACTS
On July 28, 1986, appellant Clyde West-brock (Westbrock), while in the course and scope of his employment with respondent/third party defendant Nova Fabricating, Inc. (Nova), was injured in an accident involving a mechanical power press…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Bexiga v. Havir Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Leo PIOTROWSKI; Katherine Piotrowski, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SOUTHWORTH PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Linda Thompson and Roy Hedbert v. Hirano Tecseed Company, Ltd. v. Sheldahl, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- In Re Shigellosis LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Mozes v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Block v. Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.