Legal Opinion

Holowaty v. McDonald's, Corp.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1998No. Civ.4-96-925(JRT/RLE)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

TUNHEIM, District Judge.

In this diversity case, plaintiff Rosalind Holowaty seeks to recover for injuries she sustained when a cup of coffee purchased at a McDonald’s restaurant spilled in her lap. Mrs. Holowaty and her husband Boris brought this action against McRick, Inc., the owner of the restaurant where they purchased the coffee, and McDonald’s Corporation, the franchisor. Plaintiffs claim that the coffee was defective because it was excessively hot and that defendants did not adequately warn plaintiffs that severe…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Reybold Group, Inc. v. Chemprobe Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  2. Eugene H. Mathison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. McCroy Ex Rel. McCroy v. Coastal Mart, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  4. Stringer v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  5. (PC) Kamali v. StevensDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API