Legal Opinion

Beniek v. Textron, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1992No. C3-91-1302PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge. *

Appellants Eugene and Barbara Beniek sued respondents Textron, Inc. and Homelite, Inc., a subdivision of Textron, for damages resulting from injuries Eugene suffered while using a chain saw manufactured by Homelite. A jury found there was a defect in the chain saw design that caused Eugene’s injuries. Although the jury found that Homelite provided adequate warnings in the owner’s manual, it found that Homelite failed to provide adequate post-sale warnings about the dangerousness of the chain saw. The jury, however, failed to answer whether this breach of duty…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Reinhardt v. ColtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Kallio v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Sullivan v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Alevizos v. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COM'NCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Berczyk v. Emerson Tool Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
  2. Schedin v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. Myers v. Hearth Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Olson v. Snap Products, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  5. Kruszka v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API