Legal Opinion

Lundgren v. Gaudiane

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1989No. S-2917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

This appeal, like two others before it, arises from a contract dispute between Daniel Caudiane and James Lundgren. Following the first appeal and remand, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) levied on Gaudiane’s rights under the impending judgment. Lundgren filed an interpleader action in federal court, seeking to determine to whom he should pay the proceeds of the judgment. He deposited in that court funds in the amount of the judgment on remand. Ultimately Lundgren’s inter-pleader action was dismissed without prejudice. After that action was dismissed, but before the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bevins v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Urban Development Company v. DekreonAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Pan Alaska Trucking, Inc. v. CrouchAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Sheehan v. Estate of GambergAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Gaudiane v. LundgrenAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cool Homes, Inc. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough of EqualizationAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Berrey v. JeffcoatAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Reynolds v. Sisco Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re Estate of RosenbergerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Cool Homes, Inc. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough of EqualizationAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API