Legal Opinion

Hurd v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided February 11, 2005No. A-8112PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

This case presents two significant issues. The first issue concerns the double jeopardy doctrine announced by our supreme court in Whitton v. State, 479 P.2d 302 (Alaska 1970). In Whitton, the supreme court held that even though a jury has found a defendant guilty of violating two separate criminal statutes, the sentencing court should impose only one conviction and sentence if the two statutory offenses are so closely related that there are no significant differences between them as to the conduct proscribed and the societal values protected. 1

The present appeal…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. McClain v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Whitton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Austin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
  4. Morris v. MathewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Kazubowski v. KazubowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
  2. Cronce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
  3. Jason D. Ray v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Foondle v. O'BrienAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API