Legal Opinion

Aiello v. Clark

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1984No. 7468PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

Donna Aiello, individually and as co-conservator of the estate of Fern Palfy, appeals the judgment of the superior court refusing to set aside an Assignment of Beneficial Interest or, in the alternative, award damages. Palfy purported to act for herself and as attorney in fact for Aiello in assigning a note which they held as joint tenants. Aiello alleges that the assignment was beyond Palfy’s general power of attorney and in violation of the Palfy Family Trust. We agree and reverse the judgment of the superior court.

I. Factual Background

Raymond Clark and Donna Aiello…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gouldy v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Brown v. LairdOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Johnson v. FraccacretaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. In Re the Estate of RolaterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. White v. Neal & Sons, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Fender v. FenderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Matter of Estate of CrabtreeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. Bryant v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kunewa v. JoshuaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API