Dieringer v. Martin
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case presents an appeal from the superior court's modified award of attorney's fees and personal representative fees. In a prior appeal, we concluded that the estate's personal representative, James Dieringer, breached his fiduciary duty to the estate by engaging in self-dealing and other bad faith conduct. We vacated awards of attorney's fees and personal representative fees and remanded the case for the reconsideration of fees in light of our opinion. On remand, the probate master allowed a full evidentiary hearing spanning the history of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Petrolane Inc. v. RoblesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Sloan v. JeffersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beal v. BealAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Raymond Dapo v. State of Alaska, Department of Health and Social Services, Office of Children's Services and Taun LucasAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- Barber v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Robert A. v. Tatiana D.Alaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Barber v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.