Legal Opinion

State v. Sutherland

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 5, 2001No. 24683-0-IIPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

Jeffrey S. Sutherland appeals from his conviction of felony hit and run. He challenges the sufficiency of the information, claiming it (1) failed to allege knowledge, (2) failed to specify required statutory duties, and (3) charged an offense barred by the statute of limitations. Because, even using a liberal construction of the information, the information fails to state the knowledge element of the offense, we dismiss the conviction.

Pacts

On May 21,1995, Sutherland called 9-1-1 and reported a body on Cloquallum Road outside of Shelton. Then, after *125purchasing gas and stopping at a grocery…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pardo v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  2. State v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. State v. FranksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. State v. ReederCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. State v. Mendoza-SolorioCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API