Legal Opinion

Pardo v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 26, 2017No. 68, 2016PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALIHURA, Justice:

I. INTRODUCTION

On October 2, 2015, Appellant Gabriel F. Pardo (“Pardo”) was convicted of Manslaughter, Leaving the Scene of a Collision Resulting in Death (“LSCRD”), Reckless Driving, and six counts of Endangering the Welfare of a Child. The charges arose from his involvement in a fatal hit-and-run collision with a bicyclist, Phillip Bishop (“Bishop”), on September 12, 2014 at approximately 8:30 p.m. on Brackenville Road in Hockessin. The principal issue raised in this appeal is whether Pardo’s conviction for LSCRD violated his Due Process rights, as he contends that the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Hi Holdridge, A/K/A Hiram Holdridge, Larry Shumm and Neil Delmar Haworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. NekoliteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Jason P. Brown v. The People of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2026
  3. Brandywood Plaza Associates, L.L.C. v. RichmanSuperior Court of Delaware · 2026
  4. CFGI, LLC v. Common C Holdings LPSuperior Court of Delaware · 2025
  5. Christiana Care Health Services, Inc. v. John CarneyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2025

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API