Legal Opinion

State v. Kjorsvik

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1991No. 57492-8PublishedCited by 395 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, J.

Facts of Case

This case deals with the issue of whether criminal charging documents must contain all the essential elements of the crime charged or only those elements which are actually set out in the statute defining the crime. The case also concerns the related issue of what is the proper appellate standard of review when a challenge to a charging document is first raised on appeal.

Nicholas Kjorsvik, the defendant herein, was accused by information of having committed first degree robbery. The information stated in relevant part:

*96I, . . . , Prosecuting Attorney for King County . . . accuse…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by395 opinions

  1. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. BrettWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. State v. ThangWashington Supreme Court · 2002

390 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API