Legal Opinion
State v. Mendoza-Solorio
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 25, 2001No. 18999-6-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
33 P.3d 411 (2001)
108 Wash.App. 823
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Fernando MENDOZA-SOLORIO aka Fernando Solorio Madrigal, Appellant.
No. 18999-6-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Ten.
October 25, 2001.
Paul J. Wasson, Spokane, for Appellant.
Timothy S. O'Neill, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Goldendale, for Respondent.
BROWN, J.
Fernando Mendoza-Solorio, convicted of one count of delivery of a controlled substance and one count of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, appeals alleging first, the charging document failed to allege an essential element of conspiracy to…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KirkmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.