Legal Opinion

State v. Franks

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 23, 2001No. 43678-3-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

22 P.3d 269 (2001)

105 Wash.App. 950

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Dominique FRANKS, Appellant.

No. 43678-3-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

April 23, 2001.

Catherine Glinski, James R. Dixon, Nielsen, Broman & Assoc. PLLC, Seattle, for Appellant.

Andrew J. King-Ries, Andrea Ruth Vitalich, King County Deputy Pros. Attys., Seattle, for Respondent.

BECKER, Acting Chief Justice.

The State intended to charge appellant Dominique Franks with robbery, and filed an information naming her in the caption. But the charging language accused a different person. While the flaw in the information…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. HopperWashington Supreme Court · 1992

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Dougherty v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. WiningsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. State v. WiningsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Shoop v. Kittitas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API