Legal Opinion
Tilden v. Blood
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 3, 1936No. Civ. 10162PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
This is an appeal by the City Clerk of the City of Alameda from a judgment of the superior court granting a peremptory writ of mandate directing him to certify as sufficient two recall petitions filed with him for the purpose of initiating an election for the recall of a city councilman named Hans W. Roebke.
The minimum number of signatures necessary to initiate the election was 3,818. The first petition, referred to in the record as the original, was filed on duty 31, 1935. It had attached thereto 5,099 signatures. The provisions of the city charter (sec. 11, chap. II, art. XI) imposed upon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ley v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- In Re HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Dufton v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Whitmore v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Ratto v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Adams v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Desert Turf Club v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Thompson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Truman v. RoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Baroldi v. DenniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.