In Re Holmes
California Supreme Court
PROCEEDING on Habeas Corpus to secure release from custody upon a charge of refusal to pay a municipal license tax. Writ dismissed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The petitioner herein applied for and was granted a writ of habeas corpus by which he sought to have determined the legality of his arrest and detention upon a complaint filed in the police court of the city and county of San Francisco charging him with having engaged in the business of buying, selling, and exchanging second-hand" books in said city and county of San Francisco without having obtained a municipal license so to do, and in violation of the provisions of section 63 of Ordinance No. 5132 of said city and county, requiring such license, and of his conviction and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Gaylord v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- In re FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Ex parte FiskeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Matter of Application of DartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Gospel Army v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Clemons v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.