Legal Opinion

City of Ponca City v. Reed

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1925No. 16056PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THBEADGILL, O.

This action was brought January 23, 1923, 'by the administrator of the estate of Boy A. Beed, against the city of Ponca Gity, a municipal corporation, to recover damages for the death of Boy A. Beed, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of said city, while he was in its employ at its electric light plant, and for the benefit of Buth E. Beed, only daughter and heir, who was of the age of 7 years. The deceased was a strong, robust, industrious man about 34 years of age with a life expectancy of about 32 years. He was a widower with one child, whom he had in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. L. E. Whitham Const. Co. v. RemerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Fike v. PetersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. OliphantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. State v. FreemanUtah Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API