St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Davis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Action by M. E. Davis against the St. Louis & San Eran-cisco Eailroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion-by
SHAEP, C.
There being evidence reasonably tending to support the allegations of the amended petition, both as to the defendant company’s negligence and the consequent injury sustained, it was not error for the court to overrule the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence. For the same reason it was not error for the court to refuse to peremptorily instruct the jury to return a verdict for the defendant company.
It is urged that the court erred in permitting the plaintiff to answer certain questions propounded to her by counsel. The questions, answers thereto, objections, and…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Kellogg v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Cole v. German Savings & Loan Soc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Brown v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Fent v. Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1871
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Horton v. EarlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Konig v. Nevada-California-Oregon RailwayNevada Supreme Court · 1913
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.