Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Stein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1978No. 964PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is a fee dispute between two attorneys. Initially, appellant was the plaintiffs’ attorney in a tort case, on a contingent fee. In the court below, he sought an equitable charging lien on the fund recovered by the plaintiffs, asking that that percentage of the fund which represented the contingent fee be apportioned between himself and appellee, whom the plaintiffs had subsequently retained, and who in mid-trial had negotiated a settlement. '

When the plaintiffs retained appellant, appellee was an associate attorney in appellant’s office, and was assigned by appellant to work…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Harris's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Recht v. Clairton Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. McKelvy's & Sterrett's AppealsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  5. Sundheim v. Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Styer v. HugoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Fowkes v. ShoemakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Feingold v. PucelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Watson v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API