Legal Opinion

Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1969No. Appeal, 39PublishedCited by 220 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pomeroy,

During the period 1962 to 1965 (the relevant times for the purpose of this case), there was in effect at Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter “Company”) a formalized suggestion program under which its employees were invited to submit to the Company any suggestions they might have for increasing production and reducing costs. The question in this case is whether the Company may have become contractually obligated to one of its employees, appellant herein, by virtue of the actions of both parties pursuant to the program. This appeal is from the sustaining…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Hertzog v. HertzogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  4. Sun Ray Drug Co. v. LawlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Cameron, to Use v. EynonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by220 opinions

  1. Lackner v. GlosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. PAPIEVES Et Ux. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Firing v. KephartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API