Harris's Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
The question presented here is this: Has the attorney for the owner of real estate taken in condemnation proceedings any claim upon the award of compensation therefor, for the reasonable value of his services and costs of litigation, as against the mortgagee of the property?
One of the appellants, Grace Wilson Harris, was the owner of 2121 and 2134 Vine Street, Philadelphia. Ap pellee, the Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co., held mortgages on both properties, securing a debt of Mrs. Harris upon which the balance due is $109,379. Púrsuant tó an ordinance, the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Matter of HeinsheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Wylie v. CoxeSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Crawford's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- In re TorchiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Recht v. Clairton Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Purman EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Furia v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Silverstein v. HornickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.