Fowkes v. Shoemaker
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County granting appellee Shoemaker’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Appellant now raises the following questions for review:
I. Does an attorney, who has been discharged by a client after rendering valuable services under a contingency fee agreement, possess a colorable claim in quantum meruit against his successor where the successor is fully cognizant of the attorney’s prior representation, but nonetheless knowingly accepts and unjustly retains those fees due the attorney by virtue of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Styer v. HugoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Styer v. HugoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- McAllister v. Millville Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Ragnar Benson, Inc. v. Bethel Mart AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Grimme Combustion, Inc. v. Mergentime Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kenis v. Perini Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Mager v. BultenaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Angino v. Jeffrey R. Lessin & AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- In Re MansfieldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.