Legal Opinion
Electro-Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Engineering Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 10, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a suit in equity, brought by Electro-Bleaching Gas Company, the owner by assignment of patent No. 1,142,361, issued by the United States Patent Office to Georg Ornstein, assignor to Electro-Bleaching Gas Company, for process of antiseptieizing water, dated June 8, 1915, and Wallace & Tiernan Company, Inc., the holders of an exclusive license, as plaintiffs, against Paradon Engineering Company, Inc., as defendant. The defendant is alleged to be a contributory infringer, in that it has manufactured and installed apparatus designed to use, and which do make use…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vortex Mfg. Co. v. Ply-Rite Contracting Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1929
- Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Greenport Sewerage Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1929
- Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Village of Garden CityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1926
- Wallace & Tiernan Co. v. Village of Le RoyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1927
- Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Mfg. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.