Legal Opinion
Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Greenport Sewerage Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 28, 1929No. 3675PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is an action in equity for an injunction restraining the alleged infringement by the defendant of United States patent No. 1,142,361, for Process for Antisepticizing Water, issued to Georg Ornstein, assignor to Eleetro Bleaching Gas Company, dated June 8,1915, and is based on claims 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 of that patent.
The title of the defendant was amended on the trial to read “Greenport Sewerage Company’ instead of “Greenport Sewage Disposal Company.”
The plaintiff Electro Bleaching Gas Company is the owner of the patent, and the plaintiff Wallace & Tieman Company,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Electro-Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1925
- Miller v. Electro Bleaching Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1920
- Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Village of Garden CityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Mfg. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1930
- Wallace & Tiernan Co. v. City of SyracuseDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1929
- Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Pascoag Water Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1930