Cantrell v. Wallick
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE CIROUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POK THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP PENNSYLVANIA. This was a bill in equity to restrain the infringement of letters patent. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice 'Woods
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was a bill' in equity filed by Wallick, the appellee, to restrain the infringement by Cantrell and Petty, the appellants, ■of letters patent granted to Wallick, dated May 25, 1875, for an “ improvement in apparatus for enamelling mouldings;,” on an application filed October 16, 1874.
The specification- stated the object of the invention to be “ a rapid and economical production of enamelled mouldings.” It ■appears from the record that the mouldings referred to are those which, after being enamelled, are gilded and used for picture and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by247 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
242 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.