Legal Opinion

Vortex Mfg. Co. v. Ply-Rite Contracting Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 11, 1929No. 1250PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.

The ¡bill of complaint, which is brought by the Vortex Manufacturing Company, 'an Ohio corporation, the exclusive licensee of Charles H. Parkin, deceased, and the Union Trust Company of Cleveland, executor of the Parkin Estate, against the Ply-Rite Contracting Company, a Maryland corporation, and five individuals, citizens of Maryland and officials and directora of that company, asks for relief on four, separate grounds: (1) Infringement of Parkin patent, No. 1,282,460 (application filed February 15,1916, and patent granted October 22, 1918), of which…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Monsanto Company v. Rohm & Haas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  2. B. B. Chemical Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  3. General Motors Corporation v. DaileyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  4. Buckingham Products Co. v. McAleer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  5. Bourjois, Inc. v. Park Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API