Legal Opinion

Wallace & Tiernan Co. v. Village of Le Roy

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 29, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This suit in equity relates to the infringement of patent No. 1,007,647, dated October 31, 1911, owned by the plaintiff company, and issued to Carl R. Darnail for process of purifying or sterilizing water and sewage by the use of anhydrous ehlorin gas in sufficient quantity to destroy the bacteria and other living organisms that may be contained in the fluid. The specification stated that use of dry chlorin, which is sold commercially in a liquid state, has not before been attempted for the purification of water, and for that purpose it is superior to chlorine compounds,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Strom Manuf'g Co. v. Weir Frog Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  5. Electro-Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spitz Technologies Corporation v. Nobel Biocare USA LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
  2. Wulfco v. Nyc CountyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API