Legal Opinion

Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Village of Garden City

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 30, 1926No. 2748PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion for a preliminary injunction in a patent ease.

The plaintiffs’ patent, No. 1,142,361, issued to Ornstein, for improvements in process of antiseptieizing water, dated June 8, 1915, has been held valid in an action of Eelectro Bleaching Gas Co. v. William G. Miller et al., in the District Court of the United States, for the Western Division of the Western District of Missouri, claims 1 to 12 being involved, reported in 264 F. 429, reversed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 276 F. 379, without passing on the validity of the patent,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. Electro-Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1925
  3. Miller v. Electro Bleaching Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  4. Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Greenport Sewerage Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1929
  2. Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Mfg. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1930
  3. Wallace & Tiernan Co. v. City of SyracuseDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API