Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 1, 1996No. 1CA-CV95-0140, 1CA-CV95-0358PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

This appeal involves a third party insurance bad faith claim. Following our opinion in a previous appeal in this case, Lloyd v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 176 Ariz. 247, 860 P.2d 1300 (App.1992) (Lloyd I), the trial court ruled that we established, as law of the case, that there was no contract out of which a bad faith claim could arise. It granted the defendant-insurance company’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse. Contrary to the appellee’s argument, we did not decide that issue in the prior appeal. There is an insurance contract at the heart of this case…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Rowland v. Great States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. Voland v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API