Legal Opinion

Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1992No. CV-91-0323-PRPublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Deborah Deese (Deese) sued State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company (State Farm) for breach of contract and for bad faith after State Farm refused to pay a portion of Deese’s medical expenses which Deese contended were payable under her automobile policy with State Farm. A jury returned a verdict for State Farm on the breach of contract claim and for Deese on the bad faith claim. The court of appeals held:

[W]hen an insured’s claim for bad faith arises from an insurer’s failure to pay a claim for benefits due under an insurance contract,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. Republic Insurance Co. v. StokerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API